My old systems analysis teacher once said that, whenever you make a tech purchase, it should last at least 3 years. On Saturday, July 27th, my iPod failed to respond to resuscitation. It was 5. It is survived by innumerable relatives, as shown on the Apple Support Page
I’m disappointed that I have to go cough up money for a new music device. But in all fairness, 5 years is a pretty good run for a device that was subjected to an awful lot of abuse. It persevered through:

Both Google and Evernote offer an online tool for managing notes. This isn’t a review of each product’s capabilities, but an observation on their UIs. Evernote commits way too much real estate to administrative UI debris. I get a full 10.5 lines of writable space on a 800px high display. The rest is taken up by browser chrome and the note’s title, date, attributes, action bar, source, and terms of conditions.
Compare the following pictures showing the vertical space of each. In each, the usable real estate is highlighted. Both show the most fully maximized view that each offers.
Evernote:

Google notebook:

But that’s an unfair comparison you might say–the Google notebook is clearly taller.As I mentioned earlier, I was giving each the benefit of the doubt, showing the largest online view possible. Google offers a breakout version that strips off the unnecessary chrome and actions, leaving more space devoted to supporting the core function–taking notes.

Unfortunately, I can absolutely picture the conversation that led up to this boneheaded ad. But let’s think about it through the eyes of Average Joe, Pandora listener. For Joe to click this ad, he’s going to have to subconsciously or consciously answer the following questions:
This ad is simply a shame–and even more so because someone got paid a lot of money to make it.
Oomblog is a stream of thoughts, ostensibly focused on user experience.